
The Birth of Venus
Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York City
The Birth of Venus is Alexandre Cabanel's mythological nude, shown at the Paris Salon of 1863 and by far its most talked-about exhibit. Cabanel, a native of Montpellier who studied under François Picot at the École des Beaux-Arts and won the Prix de Rome in 1845, was already an established Salon favourite by the time the painting appeared, having thrilled crowds two years earlier with the risqué Nymph Abducted by a Faun [1]. So many depictions of Venus filled the 1863 Salon that the critic Théophile Gautier nicknamed it the Salon des Vénus, and among that crowd of goddesses Cabanel's canvas was judged the clear crowd-puller [1]. The painting was purchased for the personal collection of Emperor Napoleon III, and the historian Ross King records that the Emperor's evident appreciation for the work owed more to its sensual qualities than to any claim of academic idealism, a reading that fed the controversy already surrounding its frank celebration of the nude female body [2]. That controversy, and the imperial purchase, made the painting the most popular single exhibit of the 1863 Salon and turned Cabanel into one of the most recognised names in French art of the period [2]. It hangs today at the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York.
Where it is held
Held at Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York City, United States.
Purchased by Emperor Napoleon III for his personal collection following the 1863 Salon. The painting is now held at the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York.
Cabanel Before 1863
Cabanel showed his first work at the Salon at the age of twenty in 1843 and had been a favourite there ever since. Trained under François Picot at the École des Beaux-Arts, he won the Prix de Rome in 1845 and studied in Italy before returning to Paris for prestigious commissions, including work in the Hôtel de Ville [1]. Two years before The Birth of Venus he had already stirred controversy with Nymph Abducted by a Faun, a mythological fantasy showing a white-skinned female nude caught in the grip of a leering faun, a painting that established the kind of subject matter for which he became known [1].
A Salon Crowded with Venuses
The 1863 Salon at the Palais des Champs-Élysées held so many painted depictions of Venus that the critic Théophile Gautier gave the exhibition a nickname, the Salon des Vénus [1]. This was also the Salon that rejected Manet's Déjeuner sur l'herbe, a rejection controversial enough that Napoleon III authorised a separate Salon des Refusés for spurned works that same year [3]. Against that background, Cabanel's picture stood out as the safe, officially sanctioned version of the nude: idealised, mythological, and finished with the smooth, academic surface the Salon jury rewarded, in deliberate contrast to the harsher, more contemporary nudity that Manet and Courbet were pushing at the Salon's edges in these same years [3].
The Emperor's Purchase
Napoleon III bought The Birth of Venus for his own collection, a decision that turned an already popular exhibit into the single most talked-about painting of the Salon. The historian Ross King argues that the Emperor's appreciation had less to do with any claim to classical idealism than with the picture's directly sensual appeal, and that this reading of the purchase only sharpened the controversy already surrounding the painting's frank celebration of the female nude [2]. The purchase, and the publicity it generated, made Cabanel one of the most famous names in French art by the mid-1860s [2].
Common questions
Why was The Birth of Venus so popular at the 1863 Salon?
It combined an explicitly sensual female nude with the safety of classical mythology, at a Salon so crowded with paintings of Venus that critics nicknamed it the Salon des Vénus. Purchase by Emperor Napoleon III for his own collection then made it the single most talked-about exhibit of the year.
Who bought The Birth of Venus?
Emperor Napoleon III purchased it for his personal collection after the 1863 Salon. The historian Ross King notes that his evident enthusiasm for the picture owed more to its sensual appeal than to any claim of classical idealism.
How does this painting compare to Manet's Olympia?
Both are nudes shown at the Paris Salon within a few years of each other, but Cabanel's Venus kept the safety of mythological distance, an idealised goddess rather than a contemporary woman. Manet's Olympia, shown in 1865, dropped that distance and was widely read as a portrait of a prostitute, which produced a far more hostile reception.
Who was Alexandre Cabanel?
A painter from Montpellier who trained under François Picot, won the Prix de Rome in 1845, and became one of the most successful Salon painters of the Second Empire, known for polished, idealised mythological nudes.
Sources
Editorial draws on the following references, verified against the museum and public-domain image record for this work.
- [1] book Ross King, The Judgment of Paris Used for: this artwork.
- [2] book Ross King, The Judgment of Paris (Emperor's purchase) Used for: this artwork.
- [3] book Laurie Adams, Art History (Connections) Used for: this artwork.
Editorial overseen by Solis Prints. Sources verified 2026-09-03. Click a source for details, or hover over [N] in the page above to preview.
Editorial standardsMethodologyCorrectionsAI disclosureAbout the editorial team
Take it home.
Shop this print of "The Birth of Venus" →
