Skip to content Loading

Buy any 3 full-price artworks and save 15%

Museum-grade giclée on FSC-certified paper Framed prints arrive ready to hang Secure checkout Faulty or damaged? We'll replace it free A British studio, printing worldwide
Van Gogh Museum, Amsterdam (Vincent van Gogh Foundation) · s0083V1962 · Reproduction via Commons

Head of a Skeleton with a Burning Cigarette

January to February 1886 · Oil on canvas

Follow the cigarette and the painted bones, then compare the museum’s joke reading with a biographical interpretation.

Artist
Vincent van Gogh. [1]
Date
January to February 1886. [1]
Medium
Oil on canvas. [1]
Dimensions
32.3 × 24.8 cm. [1]
Collection
Van Gogh Museum, Amsterdam (Vincent van Gogh Foundation). [1]
Accession
s0083V1962. [1]

What is the painting?

A cigarette projects from the teeth of a skull. Its pale stem crosses the dark background, ending in a small warm-coloured tip. Broad strokes define the skull, while overlapping marks build the shoulders. The cigarette gives that otherwise motionless body something resembling an action.

Van Gogh painted Head of a Skeleton with a Burning Cigarette in Antwerp in January to February 1886. [1] The Van Gogh Museum records it as oil on canvas, measuring 32.3 × 24.8 cm. [1] Those modest dimensions are useful to remember when looking at an enlarged detail: the painted head can appear much larger on a screen than it is on the canvas.

The museum calls the picture a juvenile joke. [1] Steven Naifeh and Gregory White Smith give it a darker reading in Van Gogh: The Life, describing the skeleton as a self-portrait within their account of his difficult Antwerp winter. [2] Keeping each reading attached to its source lets us examine the same picture without pretending that its meaning has been settled.

In a letter to Theo from Antwerp in early February 1886, Van Gogh describes drawing plaster casts under Siberdt, including a head of Niobe and a hand. He says his teacher allowed him to add backgrounds because he took drawing seriously. This gives us a glimpse of the training around him when he was working in Antwerp. [4]

In their 2001 drawings catalogue, Marije Vellekoop and Sjraar van Heugten also interpret the cigarette skull as studio play. [5]

Follow the cigarette

Start where the cigarette meets the teeth. The pale strokes of the cigarette continue out into the background, while warmer marks distinguish individual teeth. A narrow dark line divides the rows of teeth. Follow the cigarette towards its tip, then return to that line.

The cigarette is a small part of the canvas, but it changes how the skull appears. It provides a familiar gesture for a body that has no lips to perform it. We can read that mismatch as part of the joke. It does not require us to invent a story about the skeleton or identify it as a particular person.

Now look away from the cigarette. The large eye socket remains dark. The upper part of the skull is built from broad light strokes, and the lower jaw has a curved edge against the background. Returning to the cigarette after following those shapes makes its thin line seem especially distinct.

The pale cigarette projects between the painted teeth into a dark background.
Detail. Open larger detail

What happened at the academy?

According to the museum, Van Gogh was studying at the Antwerp art academy when he made the painting. [1] Drawing skeletons was a standard exercise there, but painting them was outside the curriculum. [1] The museum therefore suggests that he made this picture between or after lessons. [1]

That account supplies a setting for the subject. A skeleton could belong to the practical work of learning to draw, while the cigarette introduces an unexpected gesture. We can consider that combination before deciding whether the picture needs a larger symbolic explanation.

The distinction between drawing and painting also matters when examining the surface. Look at the broad strokes across the upper skull. They do not describe every contour with a continuous outline. Light paint overlaps darker areas, and a change in direction helps separate one plane from another. The shoulder bones are equally direct. Their pale curves cut across the darkness without requiring an evenly finished surface.

The visible handling offers its own task for the viewer: follow how a few changes in direction make the bones readable. Avoid identifying a pigment from its appearance on a screen. The museum records the medium as oil on canvas. [1]

Why do the biographers call it a self-portrait?

Naifeh and Smith discuss the picture in chapter 26 of Van Gogh: The Life. They place it within their account of his difficulties in Antwerp and his concern about his own appearance. Their description of the skeleton as a self-portrait connects the painted subject to that biographical narrative. [2]

This is an interpretation of the picture rather than a claim that the skull depicts Van Gogh’s facial features. Reading it that way changes the question from “Who is this?” to “How might a painter use a subject to express something about himself?” The painted object stays the same even as the explanation changes.

The biographers’ account does not make the museum’s joke reading disappear. A picture can invite more than one response. What matters here is the evidence for each explanation and the language used to describe it. The museum presents a joke; the biographers connect the skeleton to their account of the painter’s life. [1] [2]

The distinction allows us to compare the readings without making the biographical interpretation an explanation supplied by Van Gogh himself. The canvas can be examined alongside the account of his life, with the connection kept visible as the biographers’ reading.

Look at the paint before choosing a meaning

Along the crown, lighter strokes follow the skull’s rounded edge. Some ridges of paint catch the light in the reproduction. Elsewhere a darker stroke remains exposed between neighbouring marks. Follow the direction of those strokes rather than treating the entire skull as a single pale shape.

Move down to the shoulder. A long pale curve runs across the lower part of the picture, with darker marks beneath it. The background remains visible between parts of the body. These openings make the structure legible without filling the canvas with equally detailed information.

The relationship between these areas helps explain why a small painting rewards enlargement. The cigarette’s pale diagonal contrasts with the dark background. Compare the shoulder detail below with the cigarette detail above. Use both views: the detail should send you back to the composition rather than replace it.

Broad light strokes curve across the upper skull beside the dark eye socket.
Detail. Open larger detail
Pale curved shoulder bones cross darker paint at the bottom of the canvas.
Detail. Open larger detail

The museum’s 2011 catalogue describes the painting as finished in a single session, with the cigarette smoke among the last additions. It traces the handling from an ochre start through brown and muted yellow bones to the dark background. That account draws attention to the making of the image as well as its joke. [3]

Which painting are you looking at?

The museum identifies the painting with object number s0083V1962, F-number F0212 and JH-number JH0999. [1] Its catalogue title is Head of a Skeleton with a Burning Cigarette. [1] These identifiers are more reliable for checking the object than a shortened title alone.

The museum’s provenance starts with Theo van Gogh in Paris after February 1886. [1] The painting was inherited by Jo van Gogh-Bonger and Vincent Willem van Gogh, with Jo administering it until 1925, and was transferred to the Vincent van Gogh Foundation in 1962. [1] This page concerns that canvas, rather than a later reproduction carrying the same subject.

When comparing images, retain the dark background and the full shoulder area. Cropping tightly around the cigarette answers one visual question, but it changes the balance of the picture. The whole view remains necessary for seeing how the skull sits above the body.

Common questions

  • When was it painted?

    The Van Gogh Museum dates it to January to February 1886 in Antwerp. [1]

  • Was it an academy assignment?

    The museum distinguishes the academy’s skeleton-drawing exercises from painting. It suggests that this painting was made between or after lessons. [1]

  • Is it a self-portrait?

    Naifeh and Smith interpret it that way in their biography. This page attributes that reading to them, rather than treating the skull as an identified likeness. [2]

  • Why is the skeleton smoking?

    The museum calls the picture a juvenile joke. [1] The cigarette’s familiar gesture gives a visible way into that reading; the page’s close-looking explanation is an interpretation of what can be seen.

Sources

Explore the sources behind this page.

  1. [1] museum Van Gogh Museum, Head of a Skeleton with a Burning Cigarette. Description and Object data read on 7 October 2026; temporary loan notice excluded. Used for: Identity, dimensions, academy setting, joke interpretation and provenance.
  2. [2] book Steven Naifeh and Gregory White Smith, Van Gogh: The Life, Random House, 2011. Original ebook eISBN 9781588360472 checked. Chapter 26 relevant passage and surrounding context read; no printed page asserted. Publisher link identifies edition, not cited passage. Used for: Chapter 26 biographical interpretation of skeleton as a self-portrait.
  3. [3] book Ella Hendriks and Louis van Tilborgh, Vincent van Gogh Paintings, Volume 2: Antwerp & Paris 1885-1888, Uitgeverij Waanders B.V. and Van Gogh Museum, 2011. Catalogue 50, printed page 183 Used for: Technical sequence and cigarette smoke among the final additions.
  4. [4] other Vincent van Gogh, Letter 557 to Theo van Gogh, Antwerp, on or about 2 February 1886, Van Gogh Museum and Huygens Institute, 1886. English translation, manuscript 1r:1 to 1v:2 and notes 1 to 4 Used for: Plaster-cast drawing under Siberdt and academy context.
  5. [5] book Marije Vellekoop and Sjraar van Heugten, Vincent van Gogh: Drawings, Volume 3: Antwerp & Paris 1885-1888, Van Gogh Museum; V+K Publishing; Lund Humphries, 2001. Printed page 181, paragraph 3 and note 7 Used for: Attributed studio-play interpretation of the cigarette skull.

Sources checked 7 October 2026. Select a numbered reference to see its source.

Your cart
Rated 4.6 on Judge.me
Your cart is empty
Have an account? Log in to check out faster.
Continue shopping Continue shopping
Cart total $0.00 USD
Product image Product information Quantity Product total