Skip to content
Museum-grade giclée on FSC-certified paper Framed prints arrive ready to hang Secure checkout Faulty or damaged? We'll replace it free A British studio, printing worldwide
Reproduction: Google Arts & Culture, via Wikimedia Commons. [6]

The Return of the Prodigal Son

Rembrandt’s Hermitage painting

Circa 1668 · oil on canvas [1]

A father bends over his kneeling son, resting both hands on his back. Start with that embrace, then compare works whose shared title can make them easy to confuse.

The painting shown

Artist
Rembrandt van Rijn [1]
Date
Circa 1668 [1]
Medium
Oil on canvas [1]
Collection
State Hermitage Museum, ГЭ-742 [1]
Size
262 x 205 cm [1]
Where to see it
New Hermitage, room 254. Museum listing checked 6 October 2026. [1]

Scale of this canvas

The canvas is 2.62 metres high. [1][6]

The subject

What are we looking at?

Rembrandt shows the returning son being received by his father, a scene from the parable in Luke 15:11-32. [1] The Hermitage dates this oil painting to circa 1668. [1]

Begin with the two figures on the left. The father’s bent head and hands bring your attention to the kneeling son. Let your eye move away to the figures on the right, then return to the place where the hands meet his back.

A closer look

A meeting seen through touch

The son’s face turns into the father’s body. We see the back of his head and the hands spread across his clothing. The father’s red garment forms a broad shape around the much lighter figure below him.

In Rembrandt’s Eyes, Simon Schama reads the embrace through the idea of touch offering a kind of spiritual vision, linking this painting to Rembrandt’s late depiction of Simeon. [2] Use it as a question to take back to the image: how much of the meeting can you understand from the gesture, even though you cannot see the son’s expression?

The hands sit differently on the son’s back. Follow each wrist to the fingers before deciding what that difference suggests to you.

Guided looking

Look from the hands to the feet

  1. The father’s hands spread across the kneeling son’s light-coloured clothing.

    Detail 1 of 3

    Hands on the back

    Look at the father’s fingers against the son’s light clothing. Then follow the bend of the father’s head. The gesture and the face occupy the same small part of the canvas; the whole-image view lets you see how much darker space surrounds them.

  2. The son’s turned head close to the father’s beard and clothing.

    Detail 2 of 3

    The turned head

    The son’s head is turned away from us. Look at where its outline meets the father’s clothes. How does the painting hold your attention without giving you a full view of the son’s face?

  3. An exposed heel and worn footwear at the bottom of the kneeling figure.

    Detail 3 of 3

    The feet below

    An exposed heel and worn footwear draw attention to the kneeling figure at the bottom of the painting. Compare that low position with the father’s hands above.

Resolve the title

One title, different paintings

Use the artist and collection to identify the work. The catalogue entries below identify a different artist and collection for each painting. [1][3][4]

Rembrandt

The Return of the Prodigal Son, circa 1668. State Hermitage Museum, ГЭ-742. Oil on canvas, 262 x 205 cm. [1]

Murillo

The Return of the Prodigal Son, 1667-1670. National Gallery of Art, Washington, 1948.12.1. Oil on canvas, 236.3 x 261 cm. [4]

The NGA’s scholarly catalogue identifies the Hospital of Charity in Seville as the painting’s original commission and relates the clothing motif to the charitable act of clothing the naked. [4] The clothes therefore offer a specific way into this painting’s original setting.

Guercino

Return of the Prodigal Son, around 1619. Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna, Gemäldegalerie 253. Overall dimensions: 107 x 143.5 cm. [3]

The museum’s account describes the father receiving his returning son and giving him new clothes. [3]

Not shown. View this painting in the museum’s catalogue.

Another Rembrandt work

The earlier etching

Rembrandt made an etching of The Return of the Prodigal Son in 1636; the impression shown here belongs to the Metropolitan Museum of Art, accession 66.521.49. [5] It is a different work from the Hermitage painting.

In this image the embrace takes place at a doorway. The father bends towards the son, and figures carrying clothes stand to the right. Compare the space between the two faces with their arrangement in the painting. What changes when the encounter sits on steps outside a doorway?

The Return of the Prodigal Son, 1636, etching. Met accession 66.521.49. Plate: 15.6 x 13.8 cm; sheet: 17.4 x 15.5 cm. Bequest of Harry G. Friedman, 1965. [5]

The dimensions above distinguish the area of the plate from the sheet. They do not describe the size of Rembrandt’s painting.

Follow the original

Where is the painting?

The painting entered the Hermitage in 1766 from Catherine the Great’s collection. [1] The museum’s record lists it in the New Hermitage, room 254, checked 6 October 2026. [1]

Use the museum’s own record for current display and visiting arrangements.

Common questions

  • What does Rembrandt’s Return of the Prodigal Son show?

    It shows the returning son received by his father, from the parable in Luke 15:11-32. [1] The embrace is the starting point for the guided details above.

  • Where is the original painting?

    It belongs to the State Hermitage Museum, accession ГЭ-742. [1] Follow the museum’s record and the dated display note above before planning a visit.

  • When did Rembrandt paint it?

    The Hermitage catalogue dates it to circa 1668. [1]

  • What do the father’s hands mean?

    Schama interprets the embrace through touch and spiritual vision. [2] The close-detail prompts help you examine the gesture. They do not establish a single documented meaning for the difference between the hands.

  • Is Murillo’s Return of the Prodigal Son the same painting?

    Murillo’s work is a separate painting, dated 1667-1670 in the NGA catalogue, accession 1948.12.1. [4] Its commission at the Hospital of Charity gives the clothing motif a particular context. [4]

  • Is the small etching a reproduction of the painting?

    The Met identifies the work as Rembrandt’s etching of 1636, whereas the Hermitage dates the painting to circa 1668. [5][1] The two compositions can be compared above.

Sources

Numbered markers identify the support for factual statements. The guided look and the comparison also include editorial observations of the images shown.

  1. [1] museum State Hermitage Museum, Return of the Prodigal Son. Object ГЭ-742. Used for: painting and collection.
  2. [2] book Simon Schama, Allen Lane The Penguin Press, Rembrandt’s Eyes, 1999. First British publication, 1999. Read from the scanned book text; print page number not asserted. Used for: touch and sight.
  3. [3] museum Kunsthistorisches Museum Wien, Return of the Prodigal Son. Gemäldegalerie 253. The English record’s approximate date is retained. Used for: Guercino’s painting.
  4. [4] book Jonathan Brown and Richard G. Mann, National Gallery of Art, Washington, and Cambridge University Press, Spanish Paintings of the Fifteenth through Nineteenth Centuries, 1990. Murillo entry by J.B., printed pp. 109-110. Paper ISBN 0-89468-149-4. Used for: Murillo’s painting and commission.
  5. [5] museum The Metropolitan Museum of Art, The Return of the Prodigal Son. This impression: 66.521.49. Used for: the 1636 etching.
  6. [6] archive Google Arts & Culture, Wikimedia Commons, File:Rembrandt Harmensz van Rijn - Return of the Prodigal Son - Google Art Project.jpg. Reproduction from Google Arts & Culture, via Wikimedia Commons. Used for: painting image and credit.

Editorial overseen by Solis Prints. Reviewed by M Hamilton, 2026-10-10. Sources checked 2026-10-06. Hover over [N] in the page above to preview a source.

Your cart
Rated 4.6 on Judge.me
Your cart is empty
Have an account? Log in to check out faster.
Continue shopping Continue shopping
Cart total $0.00 USD
Product image Product information Quantity Product total