In this article
What are we looking at?
The subject is Christ and his disciples caught in a storm. The Rembrandt Research Project connects the scene with the accounts in Matthew 8, Mark 4 and Luke 8, placing the appeal to Christ alongside the struggle to control the boat. [2]
Rembrandt van Rijn painted Christ in the Storm on the Sea of Galilee in 1633. The Gardner Museum records an oil painting on canvas measuring 160 × 128 cm, object P21s24. [1]
Start at the bright water on the left. The front of the boat rises above it, carrying several figures towards the light. At the lower right, the boat and its passengers disappear into darker paint. You can see the scene as one threatened vessel, then divide your attention between the work at the mast and the group around Christ.
The diagonal mast gives your eye a route from the boat into the sky. The sail crosses that route, with a torn opening and a loose edge. Follow the lines back down. They lead to hands trying to control the rigging, rather than to a single person who commands the whole scene.
Follow the hands, then the faces


Detail 1 of 3
The struggle at the sail
Look at the figures around the base of the mast. One pulls against the sail while another grips nearby. Their bent bodies make the boat's movement easier to imagine. In the catalogue's description, some men try to regain control of the split mainsail while others hold a stay to keep upright. [2]
Return to the whole picture after looking at this detail. The brightest passage is not centred on Christ. It draws you first to the immediate physical problem, water and rigging, before you find the person to whom the passengers appeal.


Detail 2 of 3
Christ in the darker group
Find Christ towards the right of the boat. Several faces turn towards him. Compare their gestures with the hands at the mast: here the action is an appeal to a person, rather than an attempt to manage a rope. The catalogue describes Christ leaning back with his head raised, with pleading figures opposite him. [2]
There is no need to assign every face a name to follow that contrast. Try moving between the two groups before looking at the sky again. The storm connects them, but their responses are different.


Detail 3 of 3
The face looking out
A figure near the centre holds a rope and brings his other hand to his cap. His face turns out of the boat towards the viewer. The catalogue records that pose without naming him as Rembrandt. [2]
Michael Zell, in commentary reproduced by the Gardner Museum, notices the face’s resemblance to Rembrandt’s self-portraits and describes how its outward gaze draws the viewer into the drama. [3] Look first at what the gaze does: it interrupts the inward exchanges among the passengers and meets someone outside the scene.
A painting changed during its making
The finished rigging was not simply transferred unchanged from an initial plan. [2] The Rembrandt Research Project's technical account describes differences between the surface and the X-rays, including changes to the rigging and waves. [2]
That account is evidence about the painting's making. It also reminds us that a reproduction shows the finished surface, not everything beneath it. No X-ray is shown here. You can return to the visible ropes and sail, but those features alone do not let you reconstruct the earlier design.
The painting and its empty frame
The painting was stolen from the Gardner Museum in 1990. [4] Its theft page, checked on 6 October 2026, lists it among the works taken in March 1990 and says the investigation remains unsolved. [4]
Its surviving frame has a history of its own. In her museum article, Holly Salmon identifies it as British or French and early nineteenth century. [5] Her article describes a London workshop label and alterations to fit the painting. [5] The surviving frame was made later than the painting. [1][5]
Not shown: the surviving frame. See Salmon’s museum article for its photographs and conservation account. The painting reproduced on this page and that empty frame are separate objects.
Common questions
-
Is the person looking at us Rembrandt?
Zell notices a resemblance to Rembrandt's self-portraits in the museum's reproduced commentary. [3] Treat it as an attributed reading, rather than a confirmed portrait identification. The outward gaze can be followed without deciding who the figure is.
-
Does the reproduction show its condition today?
It does not establish the stolen painting's present condition. The catalogue's examination and X-ray account concern the work before the theft. [2] Keep that historical evidence separate from what is unknown now.
This painting is available as a print. View the print →


